Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Home About Us Foundation Leadership Headquarters Resources Risk Management Alumni Store Communications News
User ID:
Password:


Click here for help
Forgot your User ID?

Search sinfonia.org


Powered by Google

Risk Management

Report Hazing or Other Violations of Risk Management Policies

Risk Management Policies

Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia's Anti-Hazing Resolution

Guide to Probationary Membership Program Documentation

Guide to Membership Development
Fraternity education resources, including a model probationary membership program and sample educational activities, can be found in the Guide to Membership Development, which is available in print through the National Headquarters.
External Resources/Links The Myths and Facts About Hazing

Myth #1: Hazing is a problem for fraternities and sororities primarily.
   Fact: Hazing is a societal problem. Hazing incidents have been frequently documented in the military, athletic teams, marching bands, religious cults, professional schools and other types of clubs and/or organizations. Reports of hazing activities in high schools are on the rise.

Myth #2: Hazing is no more than foolish pranks that sometimes go awry.
   Fact: Hazing is an act of power and control over others - it is victimization. Hazing is pre-meditated and NOT accidental. Hazing is abusive, degrading and often life-threatening.

Myth #3: As long as there's no malicious intent, a little hazing should be OK.
   Fact: Even if there's no malicious "intent" safety may still be a factor in traditional hazing activities that are considered to be "all in good fun." For example, serious accidents have occured during scavenger hunts and kidnapping trips. Besides, what purpose do such activities serve in promoting the growth and development of group members?

Myth #4: Hazing is an effective way to teach respect and develop discipline.
   Fact: First of all, respect must be EARNED - not taught. Victims of hazing rarely report having respect for those who have hazed them. Just like other forms of victimization, hazing breeds mistrust, apathy and alienation.

Myth #5: If someone agrees to participate in an activity, it can't be considered hazing.
   Fact: In states that have laws against hazing, consent of the victim can't be used as a defense in a civil suit. This is because even if someone agrees to participate in a potentially hazardous action it may not be true consent when considering the peer pressure and desire to belong to the group.

Myth #6: It's difficult to determine whether or not a certain activity is hazing - it's such a gray area sometimes.
   Fact: It's not difficult to decide if an activity is hazing if you use common sense and ask yourself the following questions:
  • Is alcohol involved?
  • Will active/current members of the group refuse to participate WITH the new members and do exactly what they're being asked to do?
  • Does the activity risk emotional or physical abuse?
  • Is there risk of injury or a question of safety?
  • Do you have any reservation describing the activity to your parents, to a professor or University official?
  • Would you object to the activity being photographed for the school newspaper or filmed by the local television news crew?
If you answer yes to any of these questions, the activity is probably hazing.

Adapted from Death by Hazing, Sigma Alpha Epsilon. 1988
Source: www.stophazing.org


Copyright © 2014 Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia Fraternity of America Inc. All rights reserved
Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia National Headquarters
10600 Old State Road ~ Evansville, IN 47711
Toll Free: (800) 473-2649 ~ Local: (812) 867-2433 ~ Fax: (812) 867-0633
Privacy Policy ~ Questions? ~ Report Hazing